Stay informed with the
NEW Casino City Times newsletter!
Best of John Grochowski
ANSWER. You didn’t tell me what system was being used, but I’ll hazard a guess that it was an iTable from Shuffle Master. The iTable does have video screens for wagering at each player position, and it does use a dealer and real cards. The cards can be dealt from an i-Shoe with optical card recognition. It’s the recognition from the card-reading shoe integrated into the rest of the card-reading system that enables the table to display hand totals on the screens as cards are dealt.
That information also allows the system to offer instant odds on side bets such as whether you’ll win or lose given your first two cards and the dealer’s up card.
That’s the “how do they do that” portion of your question. For the rest, we enter into speculation. Automated and partially animated versions of table games have been with us for a couple of decades now, and they remain niche games. In certain jurisdictions that place greater restrictions on table games, the electronic versions have a bigger place. And we have seen some growth in large, full-service casinos, sparked by the success of Rapid Roulette.
But casinos are going to go where the money leads them, and right now that still favors live versions of table games. There’s a market for fully automated blackjack, and that market is growing. But there’s no imminent danger of fully automated games taking over the market.
I’d be more worried about casinos chasing the market away by the continuing tightening of belts and toughening of games. It doesn’t have to be as bad as the trend toward 6-5 payoffs on blackjacks. It stuns me to see the dealer hitting soft 17 even at low-limit six-deck tables nearly everywhere I go. Not long ago, that used to be a rule for the one-deck and two-deck tables, and when a casino hit soft 17 on a six-deck table you knew it was a joint where the execs wanted both hands in your pockets. Now hitting soft 17 is standard on any table with less than a $25 minimum and not uncommon in the more expensive seats.
An average player might not know that the game is tougher when the dealer hits soft 17, but over time he’ll notice that his bankroll doesn’t last as long as it used to. To me, that’s a bigger danger for live blackjack than any inroads by electronic versions.
This article is provided by the Frank Scoblete Network. Melissa A. Kaplan is the network's managing editor. If you would like to use this article on your website, please contact Casino City Press, the exclusive web syndication outlet for the Frank Scoblete Network. To contact Frank, please e-mail him at firstname.lastname@example.org.